« My Podcast Interview At Fitness Rocks! | Main | 10 Steps For Training Pain-Free »

Orthopedic Profiling

In political terms, “profiling” is a hot-button topic. For example, at airport security checkpoints around the US, we’re supposed to pretend that a wheelchair-bound 80-year old woman of Norwegian ancestry is as much a threat as a 30-year old Middle-eastern man shouting “Allah Akbar, Allah Akbar!” prior to boarding his flight. After all, if airport security guards paid more attention to individuals who posed a greater security risk than those who posed a lesser risk (based on historical evidence), that’d be profiling.

Politics notwithstanding, the concept of profiling actually has some interesting applications for those of us who deal with orthopedic issues. Last week I had my left shoulder tested on a Biodex machine (I’ve had some longstanding impingement issues in that shoulder). Now, if you’re like me, your first thought might be to dismiss the Biodex altogether. After all, while the machine does accurately measure strength/speed/endurance profiles, all test movements are decidedly “non-functional.” In my case for example, we were testing internal and external rotation of the left humerus. During the test, the patient is locked into the machine, which totally controls the plane of movement as well as the range of motion.

Obviously, you might wonder how the results of this test correlate to real World, multi-planar, self-stabilizing movement. And that’s a fair question. The real value of Biodex testing is that you first test the non-involved joint (in this case, my right shoulder), which illustrates what the strength/speed/endurance profile of a pain-free joint looks like. Then, after testing the involved side, you compare the two and see what type of discrepancies you’ve got between the pain-free joint and the painful joint. My results were surprising, because my external rotation on the involved shoulder was slightly stronger than the right (non-involved) side. My internal rotation capabilities however, were significantly weaker on the left side as compared to the right.

Now, again, it’s easy to think “OK, that’s all well and good, but the Biodex machine forces you into completely unnatural movement patterns that simply don’t relate to normal joint functioning.” But you’d be missing the point here, because this test showed me what a pain-free shoulder looks, tastes, smells, and feels like. It further demonstrated that my painful shoulder has a completely different strength profile (on this particular test battery) than my pain-free shoulder. This realization prompts me to modify my training in the direction of minimizing this discrepancy.

Now let’s take this discussion back into an admittedly more functional milieu. For the sake of discussion, we’ll assume you’ve got a painful right Achilles tendon. And we’ll further assume that your left Achilles is pain-free. Now you’re got a control that you can profile for the purposes of comparing it to the painful side. And even if you know very little about anatomy or kinesiology, it’s still a fairly simple matter to develop some tests to create a profile for that joint.

The first thing that comes to mind might be to perform single leg calf raises. Do 10 reps and take notes on how difficult is was, and whether or not there was any type of pain or discomfort. Next, perform 10 reps in the involved side. Was it more difficult? Look at both Achilles tendons, as well as your calf musculature on both sides. Do you see any differences? While you’re at it, feel both tendons. Is one side warmer than the other (this suggests an active inflammation)? Also, look at the soles of your most commonly worn shoes- any differences between left and right sides? Another self-test (and this is tricky because it’s tough not to bias the results by knowing the desired outcome, but it’s worth doing anyway): walk in a straight line and see if you hear a difference between your right and left steps. Further, when you walk, do your foot mechanics appear to be the same or somewhat different?

Once you’re done these comparisons, you’ll have a profile of a healthy Achilles tendon, and a comparative profile of a painful Achilles. And that’s very useful information to have. After all, even though pain often causes dysfunction, the reverse is often true is well.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451bf7369e200d8353360a069e2

Comments

  1. Bill Galway on Aug 14, 2007 2:08:57 PM:

    Measuring function is such a very difficult thing to do. Not many people take into account that strength imbalance and impairments in muscle groups allow asynchronized movements within force couples. That's why isolated joint testing is so important. If we do not know which components of a force coupling are not working properly we cannot strengthenen them, the result is adaptive neuromuscular compensation that ultimately leads to poor joint stabilization. Poor stabilization leads to further injury and loss of function. So, be careful when someone tells you, "that's not functional". The only way to be truely functional is if you first have all of your musculature working in perfect synchronization to provide stability on the way to function...

Post a Comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In